Dispute Resolution Artificial Intelligence Platform

AI-powered dispute resolution
built for Australia.

DRAIP gives claimants, respondents and arbitrators a shared intelligent platform — with private silos, joint privilege architecture, and AI analysis calibrated to Australian law and ACICA practice.

Open platform → See how it works
Arbitrator view · ACICA-2025-0047
A
Claimant position
Breach on 14 Mar — cl.7.2 and email trail. $4.2M claimed.
B
Respondent position
Force majeure — February cyclone. Cl.12 caps at $400k.
AI
Common ground identified
Formation agreed · NSW law agreed · 2 of 7 issues resolved
AI settlement zone
$1.8M – $2.4M
14 comparable ACICA awards · 2019–2024
DRAIP is built for
ACICA proceedings
ACDC proceedings
Commercial litigation
Mediation support
Construction disputes
Energy & resources
How it works

Three roles. One secure platform — DRAIP.

Each party operates in a private encrypted silo. The AI analyses both sides and produces outputs calibrated to each role — never exposing one party's confidential documents to the other.

01
Each party uploads privately
Pleadings, contracts, expert reports and correspondence go into a private encrypted silo. Party A never sees Party B's documents — and vice versa.
Private silo
02
AI analyses both positions
The AI reads both silos simultaneously, maps issues, identifies common ground, models settlement ranges, and assesses each party's legal position against Australian law.
Joint AI analysis
03
Each role sees what they need
Party A gets strategic advice. Party B gets their own. The arbitrator or mediator gets a neutral synthesis — no raw documents from either silo, just distilled intelligence.
Role-filtered output
Capabilities

From pleadings to
settlement strategy.

Issue mapping & Scott Schedules
→
Paste both parties' pleadings and AI auto-generates a formatted Scott Schedule — agreed issues, disputed issues, and partial agreements — in seconds.
Case strength assessment
→
AI rates each head of claim — strong, moderate, or weak — with reasoning grounded in Australian case law including relevant High Court and Court of Appeal authorities.
Settlement range modelling
→
BATNA, WATNA, and expected award range modelled against comparable ACICA awards. Helps each party understand their real walk-away number before the mediation room.
Neutral mediator briefing
→
The arbitrator or mediator receives a balanced AI synthesis — core issues, common ground, each party's strongest argument, and suggested lines of inquiry — without seeing raw privileged documents.
Powered by Claude via AWS Bedrock
→
AI analysis runs on Anthropic Claude via Amazon Bedrock (Sydney region). AWS Bedrock contractually prohibits use of your documents for model training — a legal requirement, not a policy choice.
Case analysis · Party A
Issue strength
Breach of contract — delivery date Strong
Consequential loss — $1.4M Moderate
Penalty clause — $800k Weak
Quantum — delay damages Strong
Common ground (arbitrator view)
Contract formation Agreed
Governing law — NSW Agreed
Expected settlement zone
$1.8M – $2.4M
Legal architecture

Built on
joint privilege.

DRAIP is structured as a Joint AI Retainer — mirroring the legal framework of a jointly retained expert. Both parties consent to the platform for each specific matter. Neither can waive privilege without the other.

Three conditions underpin the privilege architecture:

  • No cross-contamination — Party A's documents are never accessible from Party B's silo, and vice versa
  • No training on client data — AWS Bedrock contractually prohibits use of uploaded documents for model training. Documents are not retained or disclosed to any third party
  • Australian data residency — all data remains in AWS ap-southeast-2 (Sydney) and never leaves the jurisdiction

Compliant with the Privacy Act 1988. Consistent with the CIArb Guidelines on the Use of AI in Arbitration (March 2025) and SVAMC Guidelines (2024).

Party A — Claimant
Private silo · Encrypted · AI-readable · Not disclosed to B
↓
Joint AI retainer
↕
DRAIP — Analysis engine
Reads both silos · Outputs filtered by role · Joint privilege applies · AU data residency
↕
Joint AI retainer
↓
Party B — Respondent
Private silo · Encrypted · AI-readable · Not disclosed to A
Who it's for

Every participant in
the arbitration process.

A
Claimant's Solicitor
Party A
Your private view of the case — AI analyses your documents, assesses each head of claim, flags weaknesses, and models your best outcome.
  • Case strength rating per issue
  • Settlement BATNA / WATNA
  • Strategic recommendations
  • Document Q&A against your files
B
Respondent's Solicitor
Party B
Your private defensive analysis — AI reviews your defence, identifies exposure points, and gives you a realistic view of your litigation risk.
  • Defence analysis & gap identification
  • Exposure and liability modelling
  • Counter-claim assessment
  • Mediation strategy advice
N
Arbitrator / Mediator
Neutral
A neutral synthesis across both positions — AI generates issue maps, Scott Schedules, settlement zones, and a tribunal briefing without exposing either party's privileged material.
  • Auto-generated Scott Schedule
  • AI neutral briefing
  • Settlement zone analysis
  • Common ground identification

Ready to use it on
a real matter?

DRAIP is in private beta. We're working with Australian arbitration practitioners and law firms to refine the platform for ACICA and domestic proceedings. Request early access below.

No spam. We'll be in touch within 48 hours.